Nahjolbalagheh Research

Nahjolbalagheh Research

Ethics of questioning in the words of Imam Ali (AS)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Mohamad Kaffashan 1
Marziye Akhlaghi 2
Mostafa Delashd Tehrani 3
1 دانشجوی دکترا
2 Associate professor, Payam-e-noor university- South Tehran Branch
3 Department of Nahj al-Balaghah Sciences
Abstract
Ethics refers to the carnal characteristics of man, and questioning is rooted in human thought and is discussed as ethics of thinking under applied ethics. According to Imam Ali (AS), questioning is one of the indicators which represents that people are attentive and feel responsible for society's problems. In Imam Ali's words, the ethics of questioning means observing the ethical rules in the questioning process as a necessary condition for society's prosperity, growth, and development. Despite the importance of the questioning index in the development of society, the way of observing ethical standards in the questioning process determines the constructive or destructive role of questioning in that society. Ethical questioning has a long history in religious and Islamic texts and sources. The purpose of this study is to investigate the status of ethics-based questioning through a qualitative content analysis of Imam Ali's speech, including lectures, sermons, letters, and short speeches extracted from Nahj al-Balaghah and other related sources. The results of the qualitative content analysis showed that the ethics-questioning model, according to Imam Ali (AS), has three main issues: (1) characteristics of question (being exploratory and purposeful and paying attention to the quantity and quality); (2) the characteristics of the questioner (being wise, knowledgeable, opportunism and brave) and the characteristics of the respondent ( being attentive, eager to question and answer); (3) the results and consequences of inquiry (knowledge acquisition, enlightenment, awareness, and progress).
Keywords
Questioning
ethics of thinking
questioning patterns
the speech of Imam Ali
Nahj al-Balaghah
  1. Anderson, J. R. (2010). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Worth Publishers.
  2. Anderson, LW, Krathwohl, DR, Airasian, P, Cruikshank, KA, Mayer, RE, Pintrich, PR, Raths, J & Wittrock, MC (eds). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
  3. Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA, USA. Association for Supervision and Curriculum and Development (ASCD).
  4. Bakkenes, I, Vermunt, JD & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of education innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20. Pp 533–548.
  5. Barab, SA, Zuiker, S, Warren, S, Hickey, D, Ingram-Goble, A, Kwon, EJ, Kouper, I & Herring, SC. (2007). Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalisms and contexts. Science Education, 91(5): 750– 782.
  6. Barrows, H. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. In L. Wilkerson & H. Gilselaers (eds.). Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice. San Franscisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
  7. Berry, R. (2011). Assessment trends in Hong Kong: seeking to establish formative assessment in an examination culture. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2): 199– 211.
  8. Blake, B. & Pope, T. (2008). Developmental psychology: Incorporating Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s theories in classrooms. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education, 1(1): 59– 67.
  9. Bunnell, T. (2011). The International Baccalaureate Middle Years Program after 30 years: A critical inquir”. Journal of Research in International Education, 10: 261– 274.
  10. Franke, M.L., Webb, N.M. Chan, A.G., Ing, M., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students ‘mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education. 60(4): 380- 392.
  11. Gillespie, M. (2005). Student- teacher connection: a place of possibility. Journal of Advance Nurse. 52(2): 211- 219.
  12. Hanegan, N., Fridan, K., & Nelson, C.R. (2009). Authentic and simulated professional development: Teachers reflect what is modeled. School Science and Mathematics, 109(2): 79- 94.
  13. Janssen, J, Kirschner F, Erkens, G, Kirschner, PA & Paas, F. (2010). Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: Combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 22: 139– 154.
  14. Johnson, M.J., Janisch, C. & Mighten, B. (2005). Cultural literacy in classroom settings: Teachers and students adapt the core knowledge curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 16(3): 259– 272.
  15. Lan, X, Ponitz, CC, Miller, KF, Li, S, Cortina, K, Perry, M & Fang, G. (2009). Keeping their attention: Classroom practices associated with behavioral engagement in first grade mathematics classes in China and the United States. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24. Pp 198– 211.
  16. Liu, Y & Dunne, M. (2009). Educational reform in China: tensions in national policy and local practice. Comparative Education, 45(4): 461– 476.
  17. Marx, RW, Blumenfeld, PC, Krajcik, JS, Fishman, B, Soloway, E, Geier, R & Tal RT. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10): 1063-1080.
  18. Mok, Y, Fan, RM & Pang, NS. (2007). Developmental patterns of school students’ motivational- and cognitive-metacognitive competencies. Educational Studies, 33(1): 81– 98.
  19. Resta, P & Laferriere, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psycholology Review, 19. Pp 65–83.
  20. Reynolds-Keefer, L. (2010). Rubric-referenced assessment in teacher preparation: An Opportunity to learn by using. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 15(8). Retrieved from: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=15&n=8.
  21. Roorda, DL, Koomen, HMY, Spilt, JL & Oort, FJ. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4): 493– 529.
  22. Ross, H, Cen, Y & Zhou, Z. (2011). Assessing student engagement in China: Responding to local and global discourse on raising educational quality. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 14(1): 24– 37.
  23. Stobie, TD. (2005). To what extend do the Middle Years Programme and Diploma Programme of the International Baccalaureate Organization provide a coherent and consistent educational continuum? International Schools Journal, 25(1): 30– 40.
  24. Tan, K.S. (2007). Using “what if …” questions to teach science, Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching,8(1):161-169.
  25. Visser, A. (2010). International education in a nationa context: Introducing the International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme in Dutch public schools. Journal of Research in International Education, 9(2): 141– 152.
  26. Wood, E. (2007). Reconceptualising child-centred education: Contemporary directions in policy, theory and practice in early childhood. FORUM, 49: 119– 133 .