Nahjolbalagheh Research

Nahjolbalagheh Research

Justice as a Rotating and Reflective Concept in Social Corpus of Organization (Sermon 216 of Nahj al-Balaghah

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Ph.D. student of Allameh Tabataba'i University, Faculty of Management and Accounting
Abstract
Justice is an interactive concept. In most cases, organizational justice has a one-dimensional view in which superiors have always been in a perceptual position and subordinates in an acting class. According to Imam Ali (AS) in Nahj al-Balaghah, there is a possibility of violating the rights of superiors by subordinates as a result of perceived injustice. The present article, based on the principles of relativism hermeneutics and logical analysis, tries to explain the rotational nature of justice mentioned in Sermon 216. The text was interpreted by selecting this sermon and combining it with management theories as interpreter horizons. Due to the qualitative nature of this research, a comparative approach was taken between the original text and adaptations of two commentaries, Ibn Maysam and Ibn Abi'l-Hadid, to prevent eisegesis and increase the validity. Findings show that the perception of justice of superiors is a structure that has been neglected in organizational justice. In addition, the perception of justice is a rotational perception and behavior between subordinates and superiors, which has an effect on observers. This perception affects the organization's atmosphere, and the initiators of this atmosphere within organizations are the subordinates and their perceptions. Therefore, the best intervention to manage this cycle (contrary to the current trend, which focuses on managing superiors' behavior and subordinates' perceptions) is superiors' perceptions. The consideration of some criteria in the stages, such as selection, training, promotion of managers, and organizational controls, can lead this rotation to a positive direction and promote the concept of justice in the organization.
Keywords

  1. Ambrose, M.L., Schminke, M., (2009). "The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: a test of mediation". Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (2), 491–500.

    1. 38. Andersson, L., & Pearson, C. (1999). "Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace". Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471.
    2. 39. Blau, G., Andersson, L., (2005). "Testing a measure of instigated workplace incivility". Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 595–614.
    3. 40. Colquitt, J.A., (2001). "On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure". Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (3), 386–400.
    4. 41. Colquitt, J.A., Noe, R.A., Jackson, C.L., (2002). "Justice in teams: antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate". Personnel sychology 55 (1), 83–109.
    5. 42. Cropanzano, R., Ambrose, M., (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace. New York, NY 10016
    6. 43. Cropanzano, R., Greenberg, Jerald., (1997). "Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze". International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Volume 12, 317-372.
    7. 44. Cropanzano, R., Li, A., Benson, L., (2011). "Peer justice and teamwork processes". Group and Organization Management 36 (5), 567–576.
    8. 45. Cropanzano, R., Molina, A., (2015). "Organizational Justice". In:James D. Wright (editor-in-chief), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Vol 17. Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 379–384.
    9. 46. Dijke, M., Wildschut, T., Leunissen, J., Sedikides, C., (2015). "Nostalgia buffers the negative impact of low procedural justice on cooperation". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 127, 15–29.
    10. 47. Ghosh, D., Sekiguchi, T., Gurunathan, L., (2017). "Organizational embeddedness as a mediator between justice and in-role performance". Journal of Business Research 75, 130–137.
    11. 48. Gillespie, N., Mann, L., (2004). "Transformational leadership and shared values: the building blocks of trust". Journal of Managerial Psychology. 19 (6).588-607.
    12. 49. Harold, C., Holtz, B., (2015). "The effects of passive leadership on workplace incivility". Journal of Organizational Behavior. 36, 16–38.
    13. 50. Jung, N., Seock,Y., (2017). "Effect of service recovery on customers’ perceived justice, satisfaction, and word-of-mouth intentions on online shopping websites". Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 37, 23–30.
    14. 51. Korsgaard, M. A. Roberson, L. Rymph, R. D. (1998). "What Motivates Fairness? The Role of Subordinate Assertive Behavior on Managers' Interactional Fairness". Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 83, No. 5, 731-744.
    15. 52. Li, A., Cropanzano, R., (2009). "Fairness at the group level: interunit and intraunit justice climate". Journal of Management 35 (3), 564–599.
    16. 53. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2009). Organizational behavior. (13th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
    17. 54. Rodell, J., Colquitt, J. A., Baer, M., (2017). "Is adhering to justice rules enough? The role of charismatic qualities in perceptions of supervisors’ overall fairness". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 140, 14–28
    18. 55. Rupp, D.E., Shao, R., Jones, K.S., Liao, H., (2014). "The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: a metaanalytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and social exchange". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 123, 159–185.
    19. 56. Salancik, G.R., Pfeffer, J., (1978). "A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design". Administrative Science Quarterly 23 (2), 224–253.
    20. 57. Schneider, B., Goldstein, H., Smith, D.B., (1995). The ASA framework: an update. Personnel Psychology 48, 747–773.
    21. Scott, B., Colquitt, A., Zapata-Phelan, C., (2007). "Justice as a Dependent Variable: Subordinate Charisma as a Predictor of Interpersonal and Informational Justice Perceptions". Journal of Applied Psychology Vol. 92, No. 6, 1597–1609